Skip to main content
Codex Mundi A scholarly atlas of the senses lost when crossing borders
Codex MundiEyes and eye contactStaring at a stranger's baby (Scandinavia vs. Latin America)
e0191Eyes and eye contact · regard-direct

Staring at a stranger's baby (Scandinavia vs. Latin America)

Admiring a stranger's baby - smiling at it, touching it - is warm and expected in Latin America (simpatía, the evil eye), but can seem intrusive in Scandinavia, where reserve equals respect for privacy. Not to be caricatured as "warm versus cold".

✓ Target directionIn Latin America, engaging with a stranger's baby (a smile, a word, touch) is a mark of affection and sociability, sometimes coupled with a protective intent (the evil eye).
⚠ Interpreted meaningIn Scandinavia, staring at or approaching a stranger's child can be perceived as an intrusion into family privacy; conversely, the Nordic lack of attention can be mistaken for coldness.

01A real contrast, but not to be caricatured

Admiring a stranger's baby - smiling at it, talking to it, touching it - is a warm, expected gesture across much of Latin America; the same gesture can seem intrusive in the Nordic countries, where strangers tend to be left alone. One caveat applies from the outset: this precise contrast is not a single ethnographic data point but a synthesis of separately documented tendencies (proxemics, Nordic reserve, simpatía, belief in the evil eye). And above all, it should not be read as a "warm Latino" versus a "cold Nordic": these are two different calibrations of privacy and sociability, not character traits.

02Latin America: simpatía and the evil eye

Two mechanisms combine. First, simpatía, a Hispanic cultural script described by Triandis et al. (1984): a valuing of warmth, harmony, and positive expression toward others, strangers included. Second - and this is the more concrete mechanism - belief in the evil eye (mal de ojo): admiring a child is precisely what risks "casting the spell" on it, and the prescribed remedy is often to touch the child while complimenting it, or to add a blessing ("Dios te bendiga") (Dundes, The Evil Eye: A Casebook, 1981). Touching and admiring a baby is therefore not only friendly: it is sometimes a protective gesture.

03Scandinavia: reserve as respect for privacy

On the Nordic side, not addressing a stranger's baby reflects a reserve intended as respect for the private sphere, not indifference. A study of migrants of Turkish origin in Norway (Yilmaz Sener, 2024) shows that this non-intrusion is experienced as a recognition of the right to privacy - while also, at times, being felt as distance. The modesty of the Janteloven ("Law of Jante") is often invoked, but it is a literary satire (Sandemose, 1933), not an ethnographic law. And the image of the "silent, cold Nordic" is itself partly a myth: Olbertz-Siitonen and Siitonen (2015) described it as an "academic myth" with no solid empirical basis.

04What the research actually establishes

What is solidly established is that the way a stranger interacts with someone else's child varies by culture. Otto, Potinius and Keller (2014) showed this by comparing German and Cameroonian (Nso) stranger-child dyads: the German stranger is cautious, distant, and defers to the mother; the Nso stranger engages the child directly. This is not the Scandinavia / Latin America pair, but it proves that the gesture of "addressing a stranger's baby" is indeed culturally coded. Hall's (1966) and Watson's (1970) proxemic model - contact versus non-contact cultures - provides the background, provided it is treated as an old tendency tested on small samples.

05The misunderstanding and how to avoid it

A Latin American mother in Sweden may find it strange that no one "notices" her child - no smile, not a word - and read it as coldness; a Swedish traveler in Brazil may feel invaded by adults who address, or even touch, her baby. Each projects her own norm. The right instinct: in a Nordic context, a nod or a discreet smile is enough, without engaging the child without a cue from the parents; in Latin America, do not mistake warm attention (and touch) for an intrusion - it is often a mark of affection, sometimes coupled with a protective intent. And remember that neither reserve nor effusiveness is "the" right way: many Scandinavians melt at the sight of a baby, and many Latin Americans remain discreet.

Geography of misunderstanding

Offensive

  • sweden
  • norway
  • denmark
  • finland
  • iceland

Neutral

  • mexico
  • guatemala
  • honduras
  • nicaragua
  • el-salvador
  • costa-rica
  • panama
  • cuba
  • dominican-republic
  • puerto-rico

Historical origins

Admirer le bébé d'un inconnu est chaleureux et attendu en Amérique latine (simpatía, Triandis et al. 1984 ; et croyance au mauvais œil, où l'on touche l'enfant admiré pour le protéger, Dundes 1981), mais peut sembler intrusif en Scandinavie, où la réserve vaut respect de la vie privée (Yilmaz Sener 2024). Le contraste est une synthèse de tendances (Hall 1966, Watson 1970), non une donnée unique ; l'image « Nordique froid / Latino chaleureux » est un stéréotype à éviter (Olbertz-Siitonen & Siitonen 2015).

Practical recommendations

To do

  • En contexte nordique, un hochement de tête ou un sourire discret suffit ; ne pas engager l'enfant d'un inconnu sans signe des parents.
  • En Amérique latine, accueillir l'attention chaleureuse (et le contact) comme une marque d'affection, parfois protectrice (mauvais œil), plutôt que comme une intrusion.

Avoid

  • Ne pas lire la réserve nordique comme de la froideur : c'est souvent un respect de la vie privée.
  • Ne pas caricaturer en « Latino chaleureux / Nordique froid » : ce sont des calibrages de la sociabilité, non des traits de caractère, et ils varient selon les individus, l'âge et le lieu.

Neutral alternatives

Sources · 6

AcademicHarry C. Triandis, Gerardo Marín, Judith Lisansky & Hector Betancourt, « Simpatía as a cultural script of Hispanics », Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(6), 1984, 1363-1375. —
AcademicAlan Dundes (dir.), The Evil Eye: A Casebook, University of Wisconsin Press (éd. 1992 ; 1re éd. Garland, 1981) : l'admiration ou le compliment, surtout envers un enfant, comme vecteur du mauvais œil ; remèdes par le toucher et la bénédiction, avec variation régionale.
AcademicMeltem Yilmaz Sener, « Privacy versus intimacy: Social interactions in Norway », International Journal of Intercultural Relations 100, 2024 : la non-intrusion norvégienne envers les inconnus vécue comme un respect du droit à la vie privée (et parfois comme une distance). —
AcademicMargarethe Olbertz-Siitonen & Marko Siitonen, « The Silence of the Finns: Exploring the Anatomy of an Academic Myth », Sosiologia 52(4), 2015, 318-333 : l'image du Nordique réservé/silencieux est en partie un mythe sans base empirique solide. —
AcademicHiltrud Otto, Inga Potinius & Heidi Keller, « Cultural Differences in Stranger-Child Interactions: A Comparison Between German Middle-Class and Cameroonian Nso Stranger-Infant Dyads », Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45(2), 2014, 322-334 : les normes d'interaction inconnu-enfant varient selon les cultures. —
AcademicEdward T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension, Doubleday, 1966 : proxémique ; cultures « de contact » (latino-américaines, méditerranéennes) vs « de non-contact » (nord-européennes) — modèle ancien, tendance et non loi.